“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

Do You need help with your school? Visit www.LindasHelp.com to learn about the great services I offer for students like you. I Can write your papers, do your presentations, labs and final exams. My work is 100% original, plagiarism free, Edited, formatted, and ready for you to add your name to it. 

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2Foxo3a Signaling Axis
The ability to critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of information published in the scientific literature is a key skill for all scientists. This exercise is
designed to assess your ability to review a key scientific paper and your ability to communicate this information to colleagues in a concise but informative manner.
Each of you will be provided with a primary research paper. Your mission is to prepare a presentation covering the following points:
Background to the study why was it done what questions are they addressing what is the significance of the study in the broader context of the topic etc etc.
Study design overview of how the study was conducted with the emphasis placed on methodology.
Results: Description of what the key results obtained were.
Discussion and conclusions: What do the results all mean? Are they significant? etc etc.
Throughout the presentation you should give a critical appraisal of the paper ie do you think the techniques are appropriate for answering the questions asked are
there major flaws in the authors rationale study design interpretation etc etc.
The format for the presentation will be a Powerpoint presentation which is 10 min long followed by a 5 min question and answer session with assessors.
Journal Club Presentation: Marking scheme
The following information explains how the assessors marked your journal club presentation. The marks are based on whether or not the assessors felt your performance
was at distinction level (>70%) merit level (70-60%) pass (40-60%) or fail (<40%). If you want to discuss your marks or get direct feedback from the assessors
please make an appointment to meet whoever assessed your performance.
Assessment:
The assessment is based upon both the students performance (are they effective communicators) and the content of what they present. The marking scheme is split into 4
main areas:
7
Structure: The talk should be well organised with background contextual material presented prior to the actual paper clear aims and objectives and well structured
sub-sections throughout the presentation. Conclusions and future studies or critical appraisal is required to finish off (25%).
Style: The style refers to whether or not students are engaging with the audience through eye contact using laser pointers to illustrate key information. There is
always a strong tendency for students to read from notes or directly from the screen and this is a common fault. Other issues such as whether they are too loud or too
quiet too fast or slow etc enter into consideration here (25%).
Presentation: This mainly refers to the quality of the presentation in terms of the standard and clarity of powerpoint slides. Font size too much or not enough
information inappropriate use of animation etc are all issues that need to be assessed in this category (25%).
Content: This is self evident. The paper the students have been given are from a recent issue of Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and they will contain a lot of detailed
information here. One of the challenges is to present the depth of information whilst retaining clarity and flow (25%)
A useful web page about how not to use powerpoint can be found below.
http://www.davidairey.com/how-not-to-use-powerpoint/
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
"

The post “AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2” appeared first on M Essays.

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

DO YOU NEED HELP WITH YOUR SCHOOL?

DO YOU NEED HELP WITH THIS ASSIGNMENT?

CONTACT ME TO TODAY

 TO TAKE CARE OF ALL YOUR ACADEMIC NEEDS

VISIT MY WEBSITE TO TAKE CARE OF ALL YOUR ACADEMIC NEEDS  

At LindasHelp.com, I offer a unique and confidential service for students like you. Through my personalized and customized original service, I can write your papers, do your presentations, discussion questions, labs, and final exams too. My personalized services is guaranteed to be 100% original, confidential, plagiarism free, edited, APA formatted and just ready for you to add your name to it. 

  button_lindashelp-services
 ORIGINAL WORK   READY TUTORIALS   FIND MORE ABOUT BOTH 
  • 100% Original from scratch
  • 100% Customized
  • 100% plagiarism free
  • 100% Edit & Formatted
  • Previously done & used by others
  • Used to help you write your own
  • Instant access & Download
  • Cost effective $9.99 per tutorial
  • Learn more about both services, prices and how to order each
button_order-original button_order-tutorial      button_more-info

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

AT LINDASHELP I OFFER 

ORIGINAL ESSAY WRITING SERVICE 

ORIGINAL POWER POINT 

LEARNING TEAM ASSIGNMENTS 

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 

LABS FOR MATH , ACCOUNTING AND QNT 

& MUCH MORE

CONTACT ME TODAY

FOR MORE INFO

WWW.LINDASHELP.COM

readyy

OR

LINDA ORIGINAL

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2” 

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2Foxo3a Signaling Axis
The ability to critically assess the strengths and weaknesses of information published in the scientific literature is a key skill for all scientists. This exercise is
designed to assess your ability to review a key scientific paper and your ability to communicate this information to colleagues in a concise but informative manner.
Each of you will be provided with a primary research paper. Your mission is to prepare a presentation covering the following points:
Background to the study why was it done what questions are they addressing what is the significance of the study in the broader context of the topic etc etc.
Study design overview of how the study was conducted with the emphasis placed on methodology.
Results: Description of what the key results obtained were.
Discussion and conclusions: What do the results all mean? Are they significant? etc etc.
Throughout the presentation you should give a critical appraisal of the paper ie do you think the techniques are appropriate for answering the questions asked are
there major flaws in the authors rationale study design interpretation etc etc.
The format for the presentation will be a Powerpoint presentation which is 10 min long followed by a 5 min question and answer session with assessors.
Journal Club Presentation: Marking scheme
The following information explains how the assessors marked your journal club presentation. The marks are based on whether or not the assessors felt your performance
was at distinction level (>70%) merit level (70-60%) pass (40-60%) or fail (<40%). If you want to discuss your marks or get direct feedback from the assessors
please make an appointment to meet whoever assessed your performance.
Assessment:
The assessment is based upon both the students performance (are they effective communicators) and the content of what they present. The marking scheme is split into 4
main areas:
7
Structure: The talk should be well organised with background contextual material presented prior to the actual paper clear aims and objectives and well structured
sub-sections throughout the presentation. Conclusions and future studies or critical appraisal is required to finish off (25%).
Style: The style refers to whether or not students are engaging with the audience through eye contact using laser pointers to illustrate key information. There is
always a strong tendency for students to read from notes or directly from the screen and this is a common fault. Other issues such as whether they are too loud or too
quiet too fast or slow etc enter into consideration here (25%).
Presentation: This mainly refers to the quality of the presentation in terms of the standard and clarity of powerpoint slides. Font size too much or not enough
information inappropriate use of animation etc are all issues that need to be assessed in this category (25%).
Content: This is self evident. The paper the students have been given are from a recent issue of Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and they will contain a lot of detailed
information here. One of the challenges is to present the depth of information whilst retaining clarity and flow (25%)
A useful web page about how not to use powerpoint can be found below.
http://www.davidairey.com/how-not-to-use-powerpoint/
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT
"

The post “AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2” appeared first on M Essays.

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”

“AMPK Reverses the Mesenchymal Phenotype of Cancer Cells by Targeting the AktMDM2”